In a recent session, Ecuadorian Assembly member Franklin Samaniego articulated accusations against Mario Godoy, the president of the Judiciary Council, citing a lack of protection for judicial operators. This concern was exemplified by the case of Judge Nubia Vera, who faced pressures and intimidation during the handling of a case involving the then-vice president, Verónica Abad. Samaniego's address lasted from 16:30 to 17:12, during which he detailed Vera's experiences and the broader implications for judicial independence in the country.

Samaniego's intervention, which mirrored the sentiments of fellow Assembly member Viviana Veloz, included a formal proposal for Godoy's censure and removal from his role. However, this motion was not accepted by the legislative presidency, indicating procedural concerns about introducing such measures during ongoing debates. The situation highlights tensions within Ecuador's political landscape concerning judicial oversight and the protection of judicial professionals who often operate under significant pressure and risk.

This attempt to censure Godoy underscores growing frustration within the legislature regarding the safeguarding of judicial integrity in Ecuador. The ongoing discourse surrounding Judge Vera's experiences reflects a larger trend of concern about judicial independence and the potential influence of political entities on the judiciary, which can have serious implications for democracy and rule of law in the country.