Katrina Lehise, in her lawsuit against the Estonian fencing federation, claims that her exclusion from the national team for the upcoming European Championships was unjust. The case is currently being heard in Harju County Court, where testimonies are being collected to support her claims. A significant focus of the proceedings involved questioning Kaido Kaaberma, the former head coach of the women's national team, over the rationale behind his recommendation for her exclusion from the team.

The day-long hearing emphasized the legal battles surrounding athletes' rights and the decision-making processes within sports federations. Lehise's attorney highlighted the importance of understanding Kaaberma's reasoning, particularly the rules that guided his recommendation to the federation's board regarding her not being included for the 2024 EM. This insight is expected to shape the outcome of the lawsuit as the court continues to evaluate evidence and witness testimonies.

As the trial unfolds, it raises broader questions about fairness and transparency in sports selection processes. The implications of this case could have significant effects on how sports federations operate in Estonia, particularly regarding athlete inclusion criteria for major championships. The proceedings are set to continue with further evidence examination, reflecting ongoing tensions between the judiciary and sports governance.