President of the National Court expects the Participation Council to have more 'diligence and rigor' in the selection process of the new substitute member for the Judiciary
The interim president of the National Court of Justice in Ecuador urges the Participation Council to ensure a more meticulous selection process for the new substitute member of the Judiciary following the resignation of the previous member.
The interim president of the National Court of Justice (CNJ) in Ecuador, Marco Rodríguez, has expressed his hope that the Participation Council (CPCCS) will carry out a more diligent and rigorous process in selecting the new substitute member for the Judicial Council (CJ). This call comes after the CPCCS decided to activate the selection process due to the disqualification of Alexandra Villacís, who had previously served as the substitute for Mario Godoy. Following Villacís's ineligibility and Godoy's recent resignation, Rodríguez emphasizes the need for careful protocols in appointing judicial officials to maintain the integrity of the judiciary.
On February 10, the CPCCS initiated the process of appointing a substitute member for the CJ by disqualifying Villacís, thereby opening up the opportunity for new candidates. In response, on February 12, Rodríguez submitted a new list of candidates for the CPCCS to consider, marking a pivotal moment in the selection process. The proposed candidates include notable figures in the judicial system, particularly highlighting the qualifications of national judge Mercedes Caicedo Aldaz, indicating a serious approach toward the selection to ensure capable leadership within the judiciary.
The outcome of this selection process is poised to have significant implications for the functioning of the Juridical Council and ultimately, Ecuador's judicial system at large. Rodríguez's expectations underscore the need for thoroughness in the vetting of candidates, which becomes especially crucial given the public's growing concern over the transparency and efficiency of judicial appointments. As the council works toward finalizing its decisions, the emphasis on rigor and diligence could enhance public trust in the judiciary's governance and operational effectiveness.