The Ecuadorian Judiciary Council (CJ) has seen a remarkable turnover, with six different presidents in just under seven years, which points to deep-seated issues within this vital institution. The Ecuadorian Constitution outlines a six-year term for the presidency of the CJ, yet political turmoil has led to a revolving door of leadership, impacting the council's effectiveness in administering justice. This continual shift in leadership raises questions about the council's stability and trustworthiness as a defender of the rule of law.

Many of the presidents who have occupied this position have been embroiled in controversies, facing criminal investigations and political trials that have further compounded the problems plaguing the Judiciary Council. These scandals not only disrupt the leadership continuity but also undermine public confidence in the justice system. As each new president tries to establish their mandate, the shadow of the predecessors' controversies looms large, creating a challenging environment for reform and stability.

This ongoing crisis within the CJ has serious implications for the legal landscape in Ecuador. As the country grapples with issues of corruption and political pressure on judicial entities, the very foundation of justice seems to be at risk. For Ecuadorians, the lack of consistent leadership in the Judiciary Council could lead to delays in justice, increased impunity for wrongdoers, and a perception that the judiciary is not independent or capable of enforcing the law effectively.