In this opinion piece, Mariusz Załucki reflects on how a transition in political power in Poland impacts the stability and duration of judicial appointments. He argues that such changes create uncertainty for judges who may find their nominations subject to review or rescission based on the prevailing political climate. This phenomenon presents challenges to the principle of judicial independence, as the involvement of political actors can threaten the impartiality of the judiciary.

Załucki further elaborates on historical instances in Poland where shifts in government led to alterations in judicial appointments, illustrating how past administrations have used their influence to reshape the judicial landscape. Throughout the argument, he emphasizes the need for legislation that safeguards judicial nominations from political interference, ensuring that judges can operate free from external pressures or threats of removal.

Ultimately, the commentary prompts readers to consider the long-term implications for the rule of law in Poland. Załucki warns that if the current trajectory continues, it may undermine public trust in the judiciary and erode the foundations of democratic governance, calling for a need to reevaluate how judicial appointments are made and protected.