The National Green Tribunal (NGT) granted environmental clearance for the Great Nicobar project, which was deemed strategically important by its Eastern Zonal Bench led by Justice Prakash Srivastava, highlighting adequate safety measures associated with the approval. However, the Congress party, along with environmentalists, has vehemently opposed this decision, warning of serious and long-term ecological impacts. They argue that the project poses a significant threat to biodiversity, coastal ecology, and indigenous communities, raising alarms about its implications on the environment.

Currently, petitions related to the project are pending in the Calcutta High Court, which offers a glimmer of hope for the opposing factions seeking judicial intervention against the project's approvals. In the meantime, over 70 scholars and social activists have urged the Union Minister of Environment to reconsider the project and pay serious attention to its potential long-term environmental risks. This outcry reflects a growing concern regarding environmentally harmful projects amidst India's urgent development needs and highlights the balancing act between economic growth and environmental preservation.

The Great Nicobar project, located just 9 km from the southern tip of India and comparable to developments that might affect diverse ecosystems, has been under scrutiny not only for its immediate impact but also for the broader implications on India's approach to development and environmental sustainability. This situation encapsulates a critical dialogue regarding how nations manage growth while safeguarding their natural heritage and the rights of local communities.