Former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai recently sparked controversy with his remarks during a media chat where he condemned what he termed as arbitrary arrests by the current administration. His comments have reopened discussions regarding his time in office from 2015 to 2023, which many view as marked by significant reforms but also period of turbulence and polarizing governance. Critics argue that while El-Rufai now positions himself as a defender of civil liberties, his own record during his administration was far from perfect, leading to widespread debate over accountability and governance practices.

In response to El-Rufai's criticisms, the Kaduna-based advocacy group, Kaduna-Scribe, publicly condemned his statements, accusing him of “selective amnesia.” They highlighted the tumultuous nature of his governorship, which included controversial policies such as mass arrests, demolitions, and labor unrest that have left deep impacts on the community. The group contended that El-Rufai's comments not only shift blame to the current leadership but also disregard the unresolved issues from his administration's actions that continue to affect citizens' lives.

This discourse underscores the complexities of political legacies in Nigeria, particularly in Kaduna, where governance practices directly affect the populace. As citizens grapple with the implications of leadership styles, the exchange between El-Rufai and Kaduna-Scribe reflects broader themes of accountability in governance, the rectification of past injustices, and the ongoing struggle for civil rights in a politically charged environment. The debate thus holds significant implications for the future political landscape in Kaduna and possibly offers insights into the governance challenges faced across Nigeria.