In a recent press conference at the Government Office, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, alongside key allies, reiterated his claims of being unjustly attacked by various opponents. This session reflected Fico's continued strategy of portraying himself as a victim of political hostility while consolidating support amongst his base. His defiance was notably marked by his assertion that he would disregard the Constitutional Court's decisions, which raises questions about the rule of law in Slovakia. Fico's comments come at a time when his government is facing significant scrutiny and challenges regarding its legal and democratic processes. By openly dismissing the authority of the Constitutional Court, he not only puts his administration at risk of legal confrontations but also signals a potential shift in governance that may prioritize political expediency over judicial integrity. The implications of these statements extend beyond Fico's immediate political landscape, as they draw attention to the increasingly fraught relationship between the government and the judiciary. The response to Fico's declaration from other political actors and civil society will be crucial in determining the future political climate in Slovakia. Observers are likely to be concerned about the precedents such statements set for political accountability and the protection of democratic institutions. As the situation develops, it will be essential to monitor how Fico's administration navigates the balance between power and accountability within the framework of Slovakia's democratic processes.