In a recent broadcast, Andrej Danko, the leader of the Slovak National Party (SNS), expressed his strong support for Robert Fico as the candidate for the Slovak Constitutional Court. Danko claimed that Fico, who has shown interest in the position, promised to adhere to coalition agreements, which raises questions about political loyalty and party dynamics. Although Danko denied that Fico's candidacy had been predetermined, he emphasized that the SNS would actively campaign for him.

Danko's comments come amidst ongoing discussions about the vacant position in the Constitutional Court, which has remained unfilled for two years. He noted that Fico's interest in this role is not newly emerging but has been articulated several times over recent months. This insistence on Fico as a preferred candidate suggests a strategic maneuver by the SNS, reflecting the party’s intention to solidify its influence within the judicial arena and possibly gain favor among the electorate by advocating for a well-known political figure.

This situation highlights the complexities of Slovak politics, where political alliances and candidate endorsements can significantly impact judicial appointments. It also raises broader implications about the interconnections between the judiciary and political power in Slovakia, particularly given Fico's controversial past and the SNS's efforts to navigate its coalition position while managing public perception in a politically charged environment.