The Supreme Court of Latvia has intervened in a case concerning a detained lawyer by annulling a portion of the Administrative Regional Court's ruling which had previously recognized her entitlement to compensation for non-material damages and legal expenses. The Supreme Court criticized the lower court for not adequately considering the circumstances of the case, prompting a reevaluation of the lawyer's request for compensation after she was detained during a criminal investigation against her.

The lawyer in question had been arrested and questioned as part of a criminal process that was ultimately terminated before going to trial. Following her detention and the search of her residence, she sought compensation from the Prosecutor General's Office for the damages suffered due to her illegal detention and associated legal costs. While her initial request was partially satisfied, it led to further legal actions when the lawyer pursued additional compensation through administrative court channels.

This ruling and subsequent developments underscore the ongoing challenges faced by legal practitioners in Latvia who may find themselves on the receiving end of criminal processes, as well as the implications of this case on the rights of lawyers in addressing grievances related to wrongful detentions. The outcome of this appeal will potentially have significant ramifications not only for the affected lawyer but also for the legal framework governing the treatment and rights of legal professionals in similar situations.