Aigars Strupišs, the Chief Justice and head of the Judicial Council of Latvia, emphasized the necessity of evaluating the judges' and prosecutors' special pension law during a recent interview on Latvian Radio. He articulated concerns regarding the impact of this law on the independence of the judiciary, as it intertwines with financial security provisions meant to insulate judges from political influences. Strupišs pointed out that without proper evaluation, the implementation of the law could jeopardize these essential guarantees.

Strupišs elaborated on the differences between the judges' pension system and the general pension scheme, underscoring that reforms to the former must be carefully assessed to safeguard the independence and professionalism of judges. He highlighted that judges are not allowed to freely earn income from sources available to other pension recipients while discharging their official duties, which adds another layer of complexity to the issue. The Chief Justice’s remarks reflect a broader recognition within the judiciary of the need to balance institutional independence with the fiscal realities of the national budget.

Additionally, Strupišs reaffirmed the judiciary's awareness and readiness to collaborate with broader societal sectors regarding budgetary constraints while discussing proposed changes. The dialogue around judges' pensions is significant, as it directly influences the structure and functioning of the judiciary, indicating the critical intersection of law, governance, and fiscal policy in Latvia.