Professor Alfonso Celotto, a constitutional law expert at Roma Tre, deliberates on the legal implications of Italy's observer status at the Board of Peace. He raises concerns about whether participating in this board could violate the Italian Constitution, contingent on whether the board merely serves as a discussion forum or has decision-making authority. The uncertainty surrounding its function points to the need for legal clarity.

Celotto highlights the significance of governmental approval, noting that if decisions are made by the board, it would necessitate legislative action from the Italian Parliament to adopt a law that formalizes this engagement. He draws attention to former President Trump's intentions in managing the Gaza Strip, which further complicates the legal landscape. The necessity for a law suggests that Italy's engagement with international boards must align with constitutional provisions to maintain legal integrity.

The discussion underscores the delicate balance between international diplomacy and domestic constitutional law, illustrating the complexities involved in how nations engage with global entities. The outcome of this situation may not only affect Italy's foreign policy but could set precedents for other nations engaging similarly, emphasizing the need for clear legal frameworks when entering international governance structures.