In a troubling incident at the Prisma parking lot, a family mother was attacked by an irate CEO who allegedly almost ran over her child. The situation quickly devolved into violence when the mother kicked the tire of the passing car in frustration, prompting the CEO to push her aggressively. Witnessing this, her husband rushed to defend her, pushing the CEO, who fell and hit his head. Despite the husband's protective response, both were later found guilty of varying degrees of assault by the lower court.

The case raised serious questions about the conduct of individuals in disputes, particularly when children are involved. The mother reported that the push she received from the CEO was forceful, signalling a potential escalation that could have led to more severe injury or emotional distress for the child. The situation underscores the importance of maintaining composure in public conflicts, especially when families are present, and the rapidity with which a protective action can lead to further legal repercussions.

Upon appeal, the court upheld that the husband acted out of a desire to protect his family but deemed his reaction as excessive. This ruling highlights a delicate balance between self-defense and the use of proportionality in conflict. Such incidents serve as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of public confrontations and the potential consequences of escalation, especially involving individuals in authoritative or leadership positions.