The article, written by a former president of the Constitutional Court of Slovakia, outlines the growing tensions between Slovakia's judiciary and its political landscape. Recent months have seen notable decisions by the Constitutional Court and prosecutors that have captured the attention of the public and political circles, raising concerns and accusations about the involvement of judges and prosecutors in political activities against the government. This situation indicates a significant awakening of the judiciary, albeit viewed as a superficial judgment by some, sparking questions about the underlying issues causing this judicial activism.

Particularly, the article notes how the Constitutional Court is tightening its criteria in light of the upcoming amendments to the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code set for March 2024. The Court recently suspended the effectiveness of these legislative changes, which had not yet been published, providing convincing justifications in its rulings. This demonstrates the Court's commitment to maintaining constitutional legality and public trust in judicial processes, reinforcing its role as a check on governmental power.

This dynamic interaction between the judiciary and the government raises vital questions about the balance of power in Slovakia. As judicial independence is increasingly underscored by their actions, the implications for future lawmaking and the political environment may lead to more pronounced conflicts, which in turn can influence the public perception of the judiciary's role in safeguarding democratic principles and constitutional rights.