In Croatia, a contentious exchange arose between two members of parliament, Marina Miletić from the Most party and Ivana Kekin from the Možemo party. This dispute was ignited by Miletić's critique of Možemo's proposal to ban social media for children under 15 years old. While acknowledging the harmful impacts of social media on youth, Miletić expressed skepticism about the intentions of Možemo, suggesting that their concern for young people was hypocritical given their progressive stances on issues such as gender transition rights and abortion. He accused the party of promoting sexual deviance and even pedophilia in their advocacy efforts, thus framing the debate in a highly controversial light.

Kekin strongly rejected Miletić's allegations, infusing the discussion with a personal narrative about her 13-year-old daughter, who she claimed struggles with the emotional impact of Miletić's posts on social media. This tactic aimed to humanize her stance and portray those advocating for restrictions as out of touch with the real experiences of families. The clash not only highlights the stark ideological divide between the two politicians but also reflects broader societal tensions regarding youth, internet safety, and political responsibility in the digital age.

The implications of this heated debate extend beyond the legislature, as it taps into the ongoing cultural conflicts in Croatian society concerning parenting, education, and the influence of technology on children. With both parties firmly entrenched in their positions, the discussion challenges the public to consider the balance between protecting youth from potential online harms while also safeguarding freedoms and respecting the diversity of opinions in a liberal democracy.