Ministers of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) in Brazil have raised concerns about the government's handling of the crisis that led to Justice Dias Toffoli stepping down as the rapporteur for the inquiry into Bank Master. They communicated to the Planalto Palace their belief that the Federal Police acted beyond their lawful authority, particularly in relation to sensitive information delivered to the court's president, Edson Fachin, suggesting inappropriate connections between Toffoli and former banker Daniel Vorcaro. According to the ministers, this type of investigation commenced without appropriate authorization from the STF, raising serious legal and ethical questions.

The tensions escalated as reports indicated that members of the government attempted to leverage the unfolding situation for political purposes, allegedly sharing confidential information implying that President Lula was dissatisfied with Toffoli's role in the case and harbored intentions for his removal. This type of interference and speculation reportedly created further discord within the STF, as members expressed concerns over the integrity and independence of the judiciary in light of political maneuvering by the government. The conflict is seen as a critical moment for the relationship between the STF and the current administration, highlighting the ongoing challenges in the Brazilian political landscape.

As a result of these tensions, some ministers within the STF are contemplating a formal complaint against the Federal Police's actions, which could further complicate relations between the judiciary and the executive. This scenario underscores broader implications for the rule of law in Brazil, indicating a potential crisis in the checks and balances essential for democratic governance. The ability of the judiciary to operate free from political influence is fundamental to maintaining public trust and upholding justice in the nation.