The Solidarity Party in Brazil has come to the defense of Minister Dias Toffoli following allegations that emerged from a Federal Police investigation linked to the Master case. Paulinho da Força, the party's national president, emphasized Toffoli's long-term contributions to the Brazilian judiciary, including his tenure as president of the Supreme Court during the COVID-19 pandemic and as the president of the Superior Electoral Court during general elections. The party's statement underlines Toffoli's reputation for maintaining balance and firmness in his public duties.

In the statement, the Solidarity Party expressed concern over what it termed a "mortal lynching" facilitated by certain "corporations" and the press. While specific references to the Federal Police report were absent, the party criticized the way public discourse has proceeded, suggesting that it is based on biased pre-judgments and selective leaks of information. This allegation points to a broader issue in Brazilian society regarding media sensationalism and the impact it has on the perceptions of public figures.

This incident highlights the intersection of politics, law, and media in Brazil, particularly as the nation navigates a complex judicial landscape. The implications of such statements from political parties suggest an ongoing struggle over public trust in judicial processes and the influences of political discourse. As the investigation continues, the support from Solidarity may play a crucial role in shaping public opinion regarding Toffoli and the overarching narrative surrounding the Master case.