During a civil discourse on a talk show, Italy's Justice Minister Carlo Nordio and Giovanni Bachelet, chairman of the committee opposing a constitutional referendum, discussed recent comments made by Prosecutor Nicola Gratteri. Both Nordio and Bachelet took issue with Gratteri's remarks, which they viewed as offensive and potentially swaying public opinion towards a 'Yes' vote. Gratteri's approach has drawn criticism for its lack of nuance and insight, raising questions about its appropriateness in the ongoing debate over the referendum.

Nordio's response to Gratteri's commentary emphasized his dismay at both the initial statements and the reactions they inspired. He proposed the idea of instituting psychological assessments for judges not only at the beginning of their careers but also at the conclusion, suggesting that such evaluations could help address issues within the judiciary that arise later in a judge's career. This proposal indicates a growing concern regarding the mental fitness of judges in a framework that is increasingly scrutinized amidst the referendum discourse.

The backdrop of this exchange is a contentious constitutional referendum that is creating divides within Italy, particularly about the judiciary's role and integrity. As discussions unfold, the implications of Gratteri's controversial statements and Nordio's proposals will likely influence public perception of the judiciary and the referendum's potential outcome, highlighting the urgent need for dialogue and reform in the Italian legal system.