Feb 12 • 20:37 UTC 🇧🇷 Brazil Folha (PT)

Toffoli is expected to withdraw from the Master case and from the court

Brazilian Supreme Court Minister Dias Toffoli is expected to step down from overseeing the investigation into Banco Master due to emerging conflicts of interest and questionable actions related to his handling of the case.

Brazil's Supreme Court Minister Dias Toffoli is facing mounting pressure to withdraw from the investigation of Banco Master, which is embroiled in a scandal involving more than R$ 50 billion in fraud. Since he took over the case on December 3, his actions have raised eyebrows, with critics pointing to a series of questionable decisions that reflect a significant conflict of interest. Toffoli's involvement has included unusual provisions such as ordering a confidentiality decree over the investigation and limits on the Federal Police's access to evidence, all while evidence of his potential bias continues to surface.

The controversy surrounding Toffoli escalated following revelations about his connections with Daniel Vorcaro, a businessman with ties to the case. His decision to refer the case to the Supreme Court was initially justified by a transaction involving a deputy, but further inquiry has revealed a pattern of irregularities. Critics argue that Toffoli's conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial process and has impeded a thorough investigation into Banco Master, which has significant implications for public trust in Brazil's justice system.

As new details come to light, calls for Toffoli's resignation are intensifying, with many arguing that his ability to preside over the case is irrevocably compromised. The unfolding situation not only highlights the challenges facing Brazil's judiciary but also raises broader questions about the influence of personal relationships on legal proceedings. The ongoing investigation into Banco Master's fraudulent activities is critical for restoring public confidence, making Toffoli's potential withdrawal from the case essential to ensure the legitimacy of the judicial outcomes that follow.

📡 Similar Coverage