In a recent address, Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz, president of Mexico's Electoral Tribunal (TEPJF), emphasized the importance of political rationality among electoral magistrates, stressing that legitimacy derives from serious work and institutional responsibility rather than personal prominence. His speech was made during the first report of activities of the Toluca Regional Chamber, where he pointed out the need for electoral officials to honor their campaign commitments toward rational budgetary practices as well as political decision-making.

Bátiz's remarks, while lacking specific examples of personal protagonism or unnecessary exposure, highlight a larger concern regarding how electoral officials are perceived in the political landscape of Mexico. He indicated that political rationality must be upheld by all magistrates, underlining their significant responsibilities given the authority entrusted to them. This call for a collective adherence to institutional values is crucial in maintaining public trust in the electoral process.

The implications of Bátiz's call could resonate beyond just the electoral magistrates; it signifies a larger trend toward fostering integrity and accountability within Mexico's electoral systems. By advocating for prioritizing rational, responsible decision-making, he aims to ensure that the legitimacy of the electoral institutions remains intact against the backdrop of increasing political scrutiny and the public’s desire for transparent governance.