Counselors from Mexico's National Electoral Institute (INE), Jaime Rivera and Dania Ravel, have expressed strong opposition to a proposed electoral reform that seeks to eliminate the permanent status of the 300 District Boards. They argue that this move signifies a significant regression, reverting back to the ad-hoc electoral committees that were in place four decades ago. This change, they believe, threatens the impartiality and efficiency of the electoral process in Mexico.

Rivera emphasized that the current system of permanent District Boards is crucial for organizing impartial and reliable elections. By shifting to temporary electoral committees, as proposed, the country risks undermining the integrity of its democratic processes. He furthers his argument by pointing out that the reliance on committees that were prevalent in the 1980s does not provide the professional experience and consistency necessary for overseeing fair elections.

The implications of this proposed reform are significant, as they reflect broader political tensions in Mexico over electoral governance and the role of the INE. With President Claudia Sheinbaum backing the changes, INE counselors fear that such a reform could lead to less independent oversight in elections, raising concerns about the future of democracy and electoral integrity in the country. This debate is critical as Mexico prepares for upcoming electoral events, where fair and impartial administration is essential for public trust in the electoral system.