The recent sentencing of Lee Sang-min to seven years in prison has ignited significant controversy in South Korea. Lawmakers from the ruling party have responded by boycotting various legislative events, citing the influence of the judicial review law as a contributing factor to their political maneuvers. The discussions surrounding the sentence and the political dynamics indicate a deep divide in the assessment of judicial actions and their implications for governance in the country.

Further complicating matters, the Constitutional Court reaffirmed that the events of December 3, which were part of the military coup discussions, amounted to treason. This ruling has powerful implications for how political entities engage with the ruling on the legitimacy of past military actions and influences current political reconciliations. Additionally, Kim Gun-hee has submitted an appeal against her charges, suggesting a multifaceted landscape of political and judicial interactions in South Korea, further intensifying the scrutiny on political figures.

As the public and politicians alike react to these developments, former justice minister Jo Kook has commented on the necessity for the Democratic Party to take certain stands, hinting at the evolving political landscape and the potential for upcoming legislative shifts. The interplay of judiciary decisions and political responses serves as a crucial test for South Korea's political fabric, raising questions about accountability and governance in the wake of past controversies.