Lee Sang-min, the former Minister of Interior and Safety, was sentenced to 7 years in prison by a lower court for his participation in the December 3rd martial law. This case arose after he received instructions from former President Yoon Seok-youl regarding the closure of key institutions and the cut of services to five media outlets on the day of the emergency martial law. Following the verdict on December 12th, which acknowledged his participation in the insurrection, Lee submitted his appeal to the Seoul Central District Court's Criminal 32nd Division on December 14th.

The court ruled that Lee's actions amounted to a crucial involvement in the insurrection, particularly highlighting his role in directing the service interruptions to specific media outlets, which was seen as aiding the violent uprising. Although he was found guilty of committing offenses against the insurrection, the court acquitted Lee of abuse of power, noting that the firefighting authority had adequately prepared to respond to the orders he had given. Lee's appeal signals his intention to contest the ruling, reflecting ongoing tensions in South Korean politics surrounding the handling of the martial law.

The implications of this legal battle extend beyond Lee himself, as it highlights the contentious issues of accountability and order during a period of national crisis. His appeal could potentially bring to light further scrutiny of the actions and decisions made by government officials during the martial law, as well as raise questions about the influence of former President Yoon in this political scandal. This situation continues to evolve, and it remains to be seen how the appellate court will address the charges and the broader context of governance in South Korea under the pressures of political unrest.