Feb 12 • 11:30 UTC 🇪🇨 Ecuador El Universo (ES)

Rules, for what?

The article discusses the rise of authoritarianism and the decline of an international order based on principles and rules amid increasing direct action and disregard for others' perspectives.

The article examines the growing trend of power dominance and the rise of authoritarian tendencies in global politics, suggesting that there is a shift towards a political culture characterized by a disregard for the viewpoints of others. It emphasizes the troubling belief that efficacy and obedience have become preferable for those deemed weak or calculative, pointing out that this cultural shift leads to a disregard for foundational political principles and norms that uphold democracy and international cooperation.

The author posits that we are witnessing the expiration of an international regime that, despite its flaws, was anchored in principles and rules. This regime has provided some level of relief against the radical decisions of powerful nations; however, the ongoing conflicts, particularly those that led to wars, have sparked discussions about questioning the 'right to violence.' There is a sense that in light of the devastating outcomes of these conflicts, there is an urgent need to re-evaluate the efficacy of international law and its capacity to impose rationality in the face of might.

Ultimately, the piece serves as a critique of the contemporary geopolitical landscape where power dynamics increasingly overshadow collective reasoning and moral imperatives. The implications are profound, suggesting that without a recommitment to internationalist principles, the global order may succumb to chaos and instability as powerful states act on their interests without regard for the broader repercussions on the international community.

📡 Similar Coverage