The article discusses the current issues surrounding the recent entrance examinations in Greece, pointing to administrative flaws that reflect deep-seated problems within the nation's governance. A law was introduced with the aim of increasing access to higher education by promising a 30% increase in available places in regional universities. However, the implementation of this law has proven to be inadequate, as key regulations were not established, leaving the examination process to operate under outdated and ineffective standards.

The writer emphasizes the detrimental effects of this poorly executed policy, noting that the lack of flexibility in the examination criteria has led to numerous qualified candidates being denied admission. For example, candidates achieving high overall scores were still excluded simply because of a lower score in a single subject. This raises questions about the fairness of the examination process, particularly when a candidate with a score of 49/60 can be rejected, while another with a score of 30/60 is accepted. Such disparities suggest a systematic failure to uphold meritocracy and a reliance on rigid, arbitrary rules.

In conclusion, the article calls for urgent reforms in the examination system to ensure that it actually provides opportunities for all candidates rather than serving as a mechanism for exclusion. This scenario highlights the critical need for transparency and efficiency in educational policies, as the ramifications of these administrative shortcomings affect the future of countless students aspiring for higher education in Greece.