In a recent address, Donald Tusk discussed the potential for a presidential veto regarding the SAFE program, casting doubt on whether the National Security Council (RBN) was merely a preparatory step for shaping public opinion ahead of the veto. He remarked that the prospect of vetoing the law appears increasingly unlikely. Tusk emphasized his confusion regarding the uncertainties expressed by the President and his advisors about the value that SAFE adds to national security.

The context of Tusk's comments comes following a meeting of the RBN and a subsequent press encounter with the President. The discussions held are crucial for understanding the government's position on the SAFE program, which aims to enhance Poland's security protocols. Tusk's critique appears to signify a growing concern over the transparency of the decision-making process surrounding national security initiatives.

Furthermore, as the situation develops, it reflects the tensions within Polish politics regarding defense strategies and resource allocation. With the Prime Minister set to travel to Brussels shortly after addressing reporters, the implications of these discussions may also extend to Poland's international partnerships and defense commitments within Europe, underscoring the importance of clarity in the governance of such pivotal programs.