The Polish government is currently deliberating over the SAFE program, a European Union loan instrument designed to enhance military capabilities in member states, with Poland slated to be a major beneficiary. However, opposition party members have mounted a vigorous campaign against the program, claiming it represents a substantial financial burden that future generations will have to repay. They emphasize concerns about the European Commission potentially blocking access to funds if opposition parties win the 2027 elections, citing rule of law violations as the justification.

Additionally, the right-wing opposition argues that Germany stands to profit from this arrangement without having to contribute, as they chose not to participate in the SAFE program. This leads to a narrative that suggests Poland’s involvement could disproportionately benefit Germany rather than strengthening Poland’s defense as intended. The article raises questions about whether the arguments being made by the opposition will resonate with voters, particularly those of Karol Nawrocki, and whether the military leadership should consider a veto against the legislation allowing Poland to benefit from the program.

Overall, the discussion reflects deeper political tensions regarding defense spending and European integration, with implications for Poland's military future and sovereignty. The backlash against the SAFE program serves to illustrate the ongoing debates within Polish politics regarding the balance between national interests and European commitments, particularly in the context of security and military readiness.