Feb 12 • 09:00 UTC 🇮🇹 Italy Il Giornale

Blocking Glovo does not help the weakest

The article examines the legal scrutiny of Glovo in Italy over alleged exploitation of food delivery workers, arguing that low pay is a result of broader economic challenges rather than coercion.

The article addresses recent legal investigations into Glovo regarding its payment practices for food delivery workers, suggesting that many of these workers are underpaid and may be experiencing exploitation. However, the author argues against the narrative that these workers are coerced into accepting low pay, noting that they make a choice to work in this sector due to the lack of better alternatives in the current economic climate.

The discussion highlights the disparity in pay between similar jobs in different regions, citing that food delivery jobs in places like Canton Ticino can offer significantly higher wages—around 20 Swiss francs per hour, twice as much as in Italy. This comparison serves to illustrate the deeper economic issues at play, where regulatory policies and public spending have weakened Italy's economy, particularly for young people entering the job market.

The author calls for a change in approach, criticizing the moralistic views that seek to block companies like Glovo without addressing the systemic issues that lead to low wages. The article emphasizes the need for a more robust economic framework that provides better opportunities and wages for workers, rather than punitive measures against companies operating within the existing market.

📡 Similar Coverage