The article reflects on the ethical responsibilities of journalists in the context of perceived widespread corruption. It posits that if everyone is considered corrupt, then the term holds less significance, suggesting a moral dilution in accountability. The author emphasizes that the press has both legal constraints and ethical imperatives that compel them to serve the public's interest with integrity and depth, rather than just rushing to publish sensational news.

A critical argument presented is the finite nature of resources in journalism, where time and effort spent must be weighed against the social relevance of the news being reported. The text asserts that journalists should not merely aim to be the first to break a story but should also prioritize the accuracy and societal significance of the information they disclose. This necessity for discernment is particularly emphasized in a media landscape that can often devolve into a race for headlines at the expense of depth and substance.

Ultimately, the article calls for a reevaluation of journalistic practices in Mexico, advocating for a more responsible approach to reporting that focuses on meaningful contributions to public discourse rather than mere sensationalism. By fostering an environment of ethical journalism, it suggests that the media can responsibly address the notion of corruption and its implications for society, reinforcing the noble purpose of informing the public through careful and thoughtful reporting.