The article explores the complex relationship between politics and communication in Argentina, emphasizing that while communication is integral to politics, it can often be toxic rather than transparent. The author points out that social media creates an illusion of political participation, especially among activists who write for these platforms. In contrast, investigative journalism bears significant costs, including political persecution, legal challenges, and in extreme cases, physical threats, especially in regions resembling feudal systems.

The piece argues against journalistic corporatism, suggesting that not all journalists deserve blanket defense. Instead, the author criticizes the rise of pseudocommunicators who prioritize sensationalism over meaningful investigation and argumentation, ultimately diluting the quality of journalism. The loss of ground to these loud voices represents a significant concern for the integrity of the media landscape.

Lastly, the article references Anton Jäger’s insightful work, "Hiperpolítica," which sheds light on the paradox of digital public spaces in the context of modern journalism. Jäger's observations invite a deeper reflection on the effects of hypercommunication and the essential need for integrity and accountability within journalism, especially in the face of overwhelming noise from less credible communicators.