On October 12, the Seoul Central District Court determined that former Minister of the Interior, Lee Sang-min, was likely instructed by then-President Yoon Seok-youl to issue a directive concerning the cutting off of utilities to certain media outlets during the martial law period. The court expressed that the evidence indicated Lee received a document related to this order directly from Yoon. While Lee had previously claimed he merely glanced at the document during a meeting in Yoon's office without direct orders, the court's ruling contradicts his defense, raising serious questions about accountability and transparency among high-ranking officials during a state of emergency.

This case revolves around significant allegations against Lee, who is accused of participating in a coup by giving orders that affected media outlets such as Hankyoreh. He faces multiple charges, including important duties in a rebellion, abuse of power, and perjury. After previously testifying in former President Yoon's impeachment trial that he had never received such directives nor communicated them to the Fire Service, the court's verdict suggests potential implications for his credibility and legal standing. The ruling reflects ongoing tensions in South Korea's political landscape, particularly regarding the use of governmental power against media organizations.

As the investigation progresses, the ramifications extend beyond Lee; they highlight broader concerns about press freedom and the rule of law in South Korea. The implications of the court's findings could serve as a precedent for how political leaders interact with media during crises. It also signals to the public the judiciary's role in addressing potential governmental overreach, establishing a critical line between political authority and press independence.