The Anti-Corruption Secretariat of Mexico has publicly disputed the latest findings from Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), which ranked Mexico low with a score of 27 out of a possible 100. This score indicates a stagnation in corruption perception and suggests that the country remains entrenched among the most corrupt nations. In a statement, the Secretariat urged for a careful interpretation of the CPI results and highlighted a perceived disconnect between expert assessments used to compile the CPI and the views of the general population.

The Secretariat emphasized that Mexico's score of 27 represents a slight improvement from the previous year, where it scored 26 in 2024. They argue that multiple national and international measurements indicate a gradual reduction in everyday experiences of corrupt practices among the populace and that there has been a steady strengthening of institutional legitimacy. This assertion suggests a narrative that stands in stark contrast to the findings presented by Transparency International, emphasizing a divergence in perspectives regarding the state of corruption in the country.

The tensions between the Anti-Corruption Secretariat's assessment and Transparency International's findings reflect broader issues concerning transparency, institutional integrity, and public perception of governance in Mexico. As the debate continues, it raises questions about the methodologies employed to gauge corruption and the importance of aligning expert opinions with the realities experienced by citizens, ultimately affecting public trust in governance and anti-corruption efforts in the nation.