The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) classifies the eel as a critically endangered species, with its population declining at an alarming rate faster than a human lifespan. This decline is felt not only globally but specifically within Europe, where the situation is dire. Amidst this crisis, the international scientific community advocates for an immediate halt to eel fishing to alleviate pressure on the species' survival.

However, political discussions surrounding this issue continue to frame the matter in economic terms, which raises concerns about prioritizing short-term economic benefits over long-term ecological sustainability. The ongoing debates suggest that financial considerations are overshadowing the urgent need for conservation measures. The situation highlights a troubling trend where scientific advice is being ignored as policymakers grapple with the implications of restricting fishing activities that are integral to certain economies.

Conservationist Farištamo Eller emphasizes the moral dilemma faced by society: should we continue to indulge in luxury that comes at the expense of a species' survival? This poignant question serves as a critique of the current approach to environmental governance, stressing the need for a more responsible engagement with nature that prioritizes biodiversity and ecological health over immediate economic gains.