The article explores the transformation of ideology from a tool for understanding reality to an emotional vector of social belonging, which is often immune to rational thought. It highlights how in polarized societies, segments of the population may become zealously demanding their perceived rights and dignities, losing sight of the common citizenhood that should unite them. This situation creates a scenario where the focus shifts from rational discourse to fanatical demands, where people identify more as part of factions rather than as individuals within a society.

The narrative suggests that such polarization manifests in conflicts between different groups, such as the young versus the old, productive versus unproductive individuals, men against women, and even territorial disputes. The author warns that when ideology is transformed into an emotional weapon, it breeds resentment among those who feel their rights or identities are under threat. This emotional and ideological 'boomerang' effect can lead the aggrieved parties to also vote radically, thereby further entrenching divisions as they seek to reclaim what they perceive has been lost.

In the context of Ecuador, the piece provides an insightful critique of how social movements and political strategies can become emotionally charged, overshadowing rational discussion and compromise. It urges readers to reconsider their voting motivations and the ethical implications behind their demands, cautioning that selfish, unethical motivations can incite anger and counterproductive responses from affected groups. The discussion hints at a need for more empathetic dialogue and an understanding of the shared burdens and rights within a diverse society.