In the ongoing trial of Marius Borg Høiby, he objected to the introduction of private messages exchanged with a close friend, claiming they were simply "boy talk" and should not be shared in court. These messages, which included negative remarks about a woman he had an intimate relationship with, were introduced by the prosecution as part of the evidence against him. Høiby expressed regret that the woman involved would have to read his comments, which he characterized as crude joking between friends.

During the court proceedings, Høiby defended his statements as being misconstrued and emphasized that they were never intended for public disclosure. He remarked that the messages represented a private conversation that reflected nothing more than a social banter among male friends. Høiby confirmed to the court that he requested the police not to present these messages as evidence, underscoring his concern for the woman's feelings and the potential harm that could come from her having access to such remarks.

This case has significant implications, as it involves sensitive issues surrounding consent and the treatment of women within legal contexts. The trial not only highlights the personal allegations against Høiby but also raises important questions about how private communications can be interpreted in serious cases of sexual misconduct. The proceedings will continue to evolve as more evidence is presented, and the attitudes towards male discourse in such situations will likely be scrutinized in the public sphere.