Bad Bunny's recent performance at the Super Bowl has emerged as one of the most significant cultural statements against Donald Trump's policies, capturing widespread attention and fueling discussions long after the event. The performance, lasting thirteen minutes, stands out in a landscape where many in Hollywood remain reticent to take a public stance against Trump, reflecting ongoing fears and pressures reminiscent of his first term in office.

Despite the prevailing culture of silence among many celebrities, Bad Bunny's act at the Super Bowl has sparked conversations about the responsibilities of public figures to speak out against political issues. In a season filled with award contenders, the focus shifts to the implications of celebrity activism and the challenges that arise when artists consider whether to use their platforms for advocacy. Interviews with industry insiders, including those from El País, reveal a consistent hesitation fueled by the fear of backlash and the need to maintain careers in a polarized environment.

As discussions of accountability and activism continue to unfold, the contrast between Bad Bunny's boldness and the silence of many Hollywood figures raises questions about the role of the entertainment industry in political discourse. The ongoing reluctance of celebrities to confront Trump suggests a significant tension between professional survival and moral obligation, pushing audiences to contemplate the importance of vocal resistance in times of political turmoil.