In a controversial statement made during an interview with RT, a former commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hussein Kanani, accused Saudi Arabia of possessing nuclear weapons. He asserted that the United States is aware of this development, suggesting a serious shift in the balance of power within the region amid escalating tensions between Iran and the U.S. over nuclear capabilities. This claim adds to the already fraught security environment in the Middle East, raising concerns over nuclear proliferation in a region with complex geopolitical dynamics.

Kanani elaborated that foreign intelligence agencies, particularly Israel's Mossad and the CIA, are allegedly financing protests against the Iranian government. He indicated that their goal is not merely to destabilize Iran's government, but to incite broader divisions within the country. This assertion reflects longstanding fears within Iran about external influences undermining its sovereignty. Given the sensitive context of U.S.-Iran relations, his statements highlight the implications of espionage and interventionist policies in contributing to regional instability.

The implications of Kanani's accusations are significant, as they challenge the narrative surrounding nuclear proliferation and security in the Middle East. If true, the idea that Saudi Arabia is pursuing nuclear weapons could lead to increased tensions not only between Iran and Saudi Arabia but also involving the U.S. and other global players. This could prompt urgent discussions about nuclear oversight and security protocols in a volatile area, potentially leading to more rigorous sanctions or diplomatic efforts to mitigate further escalation in military capabilities among regional adversaries.