Eni Aluko has publicly accused Laura Woods of gaslighting in a heated dispute that has reignited discussions about women's representation in sports punditry. The conflict began when Woods criticized Aluko's recent views on male pundits' impact on women's opportunities, calling her comments detrimental to women's progress in the field. This back-and-forth has attracted significant media attention, highlighting the nuanced and often contentious conversations surrounding gender and sports commentary.

Aluko, a former England international, has been vocal about her belief that many male pundits, including notable figures such as Ian Wright, are impeding the advancement of female voices in football analysis. She had previously faced backlash for her comments regarding Wright, indicating that he should recognize his significant influence and how it could potentially block opportunities for women in sports commentary. By reiterating her stance, Aluko stresses the need for a more inclusive environment in sports media, yet her remarks seem to have only intensified the conflict between her and Woods.

This ongoing dispute not only underscores the tension within football commentary regarding gender representation but also speaks to the broader societal conversations about accountability, support, and the dynamics of power in professional spaces. As this situation progresses, it remains to be seen how it will impact the discourse surrounding women's roles in sports media and the support they receive from their male counterparts.