Laura Woods has reacted strongly to comments made by Eni Aluko about the lack of opportunities for women pundits in sports media. In a post on social media platform X, Woods criticized the notion that being a former player qualifies someone to be a pundit, arguing that a range of factors—such as communication skills, audience engagement, and panel chemistry—are far more important. She expressed concern that focusing solely on women's commentary might inadvertently hinder the growth of women's football and related discussions.

Woods specifically objected to Aluko's statement that the women's game should be 'by women for women,' suggesting that this mentality could restrict outreach and support for women's sports. She believes that the exclusion of men and boys from the viewership demographic is detrimental to the growth of the women's game. Instead, Woods advocates for a more inclusive approach, one that encourages both genders to engage with women's football, mimicking how male players like Ian Wright draw interest and support from a diverse audience.

This public dispute highlights ongoing conversations around representation and opportunities for women in sports media. Woods’ comments reflect a broader debate about how to effectively promote and develop women’s sports, suggesting that inclusivity and collaboration across genders are essential for fostering a successful environment for all pundits and athletes involved in women's football.