The article reflects on the changing dynamics of political communication in Greece, particularly focusing on the current government's spokesperson. It draws comparisons with past practices, emphasizing how previous spokespersons would engage in daily briefings with journalists, even during politically tense situations. These sessions would often include extensive Q&A segments where tough questions were welcomed, showcasing a more confrontational yet transparent approach to communication.

The author recalls specific historical instances that required extensive communication, such as the case involving Abdullah Öcalan, where spokespersons were prepared to face difficult inquiries for hours on end. In stark contrast, the article implies that the current government's handling of information and media interaction lacks the same level of openness and accountability. It suggests that the current spokesperson has deviated significantly from the interactive and engaging styles exhibited by their predecessors, leading to concerns about the effectiveness of government communication in addressing public inquiries.

Ultimately, the article raises critical questions about the role of governmental representatives in maintaining public trust through open dialogue and responsiveness. It suggests that a more proactive approach might be necessary for the current administration, hinting at the possible repercussions of neglecting the media's role in political oversight and accountability.