Alexandra Villacís, an alternate member of the Judiciary Council in Ecuador, expressed confusion over her removal from the position, which she learned about through the media rather than official channels.
Alexandra Villacís Parada, who served as the alternate member for Mario Godoy at the Judiciary Council (CJ) in Ecuador, was surprised to learn of her separation from the council through the press instead of receiving formal notification. She deemed the situation unusual, especially considering her lack of prior knowledge or official communication regarding the decision. The Judiciary Council had requested the activation of a process with the Citizens Participation and Social Control Council (CPCCS) for the appointment of a new alternate member following her removal.
The removal was noted to stem from a reported impediment to her public service candidacy as indicated by the Ministry of Labor, which played a direct role in her separation. The incident coincided with Godoy's request for unpaid leave, which initiated the process of primary designation for Villacís. This unexpected removal raises questions about the decision-making processes within the Judiciary Council and how such decisions impact leadership continuity and public trust in the institution.
In light of these developments, Villacís recalled a call from the Human Talent department of the institution, requesting her to submit a list of candidates for her replacement. This swift unfolding of events suggests possible disorganization within the counsel's operational protocols and highlights an urgent need for clearer communication and procedural adherence in governance matters, particularly concerning appointments and removals in public office.
