Feb 9 • 21:56 UTC 🇪🇨 Ecuador El Universo (ES)

Judiciary Council removes Alexandra Villacís as substitute vocal and asks for a replacement for Mario Godoy

The Judiciary Council of Ecuador has requested the Citizens Participation and Social Control Council to initiate the designation process for a new substitute vocal following the removal of Alexandra Villacís due to public service ineligibility.

The Judiciary Council (CJ) of Ecuador has proactively asked the Citizens Participation and Social Control Council (CPCCS) to initiate the appointment of a new substitute vocal for Mario Godoy, who currently serves as a councilor and president of the council. This request comes after Alexandra Villacís Parada, the previously elected substitute vocal, was removed from her position due to a reported incapacity to hold a public office, as disclosed by the Ministry of Labor. The decision was made official on February 9, 2026, with indications that Villacís is ineligible for public service following information received from the Internal Revenue Service (SRI).

The context surrounding Villacís's removal centers on compliance with regulations requiring public officials to uphold certain eligibility criteria. The Ministry of Labor confirmed the ineligibility of Villacís, marking this action as a response to ensure the integrity of the Judiciary Council’s composition. The CJ's decision reflects an ongoing effort to maintain transparency and accountability within public institutions, as having ineligible members may compromise the council's functionality and its public perception.

The implications of this development extend beyond the immediate governance of the Judiciary Council. It raises questions about the processes utilized in the initial appointment of council members and the oversight mechanisms in place. This situation may prompt a review of current regulations governing public officials in Ecuador, enhancing scrutiny on their eligibility and potentially leading to reforms that safeguard public positions from being filled by individuals who do not meet the required standards. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of proactive oversight by institutions like the CJ and CPCCS to uphold democracy and ensure public trust.

📡 Similar Coverage