Some analysts argue that global dynamics are returning to a state reminiscent of the competition among great powers, akin to the Westphalian international system established in 1648. This system was characterized by sovereign states respecting each other's borders but engaging more in rivalry than cooperation. However, when examining Trump's foreign policy through this lens, it becomes clear that his actions often defy conventional understanding of both isolationism and realism. For example, Trump's aggressive stance towards foreign nations challenges the concept of isolationism since he engages in military actions similar to his predecessors.

Moreover, Trump's policies are sometimes detrimental to American national interests, as demonstrated by the controversy surrounding Greenland, where his approach led to conflicts with key allies. Notably, even French President Emmanuel Macron expressed confusion over Trump's intentions regarding Greenland, highlighting the unpredictability of his foreign engagements. The rising theory, which emerged in recent discussions, posits that understanding Trump's foreign policy behaviors can be likened to the intricate and often erratic strategies employed by royal families in the 16th century, suggesting a departure from established frameworks in international relations.

This new theory, gaining traction among American commentators recently, may provide a more coherent explanation of Trump's foreign actions and intentions. It underlines the necessity of re-evaluating historical perspectives on state behavior in light of modern political realities, especially in an era where traditional diplomatic norms are challenged by unconventional leadership styles. Ultimately, this invites scholars and policymakers alike to reconsider the implications of Trump's approach to global affairs and its potential long-term effects on international relations.