Since Donald Trump's return to the White House, many have been left uncertain about the strategy that guides his foreign policy choices. It is evident that he does not respect the so-called liberal world order that has been in place since the end of World War II, which was founded on rules and institutions designed to foster cooperation among nations. Instead, there are suggestions that we are regressing to a period characterized by competition among great powers, reminiscent of the Westphalian international system established following the Thirty Years' War in 1648, which was based on sovereign states respecting each other's borders while competing for dominance rather than cooperating. However, some analysts argue that Trump's approach to foreign policy does not entirely align with this historical perspective. As noted by Andreas Kluth of Bloomberg, Trump cannot be labeled an isolationist since he has continued military interventions and bombings in foreign countries, possibly even more than his predecessors. Furthermore, his actions do not fit the realist framework, as he often undermines U.S. national interests, complicating the understanding of his motives and strategies on the global stage. This inconsistency poses significant implications for both American foreign relations and global stability, as the U.S. navigates a shifting power landscape where the dynamics between nation-states are increasingly competitive. A prime example of this is Trump's handling of Greenland, showcasing his unpredictable style and the potential ramifications of his foreign policy decisions, which may not align with traditional norms or strategic rationality. The future of international relations under such guidance remains uncertain as historical precedents may no longer apply under Trump's leadership.