The article discusses the contentious atmosphere leading up to the referendum set for March 22-23 regarding the separation of careers in the Italian judiciary. This reform has divided opinions among judges, with some firmly opposing the separation and others supporting it. The disagreement has intensified as both 'yes' and 'no' committees argue passionately for their respective positions, awaiting a verdict from the Italian public on the matter.

Recently, a controversial Facebook post from a prominent judge in Torre Annunziata surfaced, which contained unflattering remarks directed towards Giovanni Donzelli, a member of the political party advocating for the reform. The post, intended for a limited audience, reflects the deepening rift within the judicial community as figures on both sides use increasingly aggressive rhetoric to promote their arguments. The judge's comments suggest that the opposition is counterproductive, further intensifying the already polarized discussion surrounding the referendum.

As the referendum approaches, the implications of the outcomes could have significant ramifications not just for the judiciary but also for the political landscape in Italy. With public opinion split and both sides mobilizing their arguments, the results of the vote could either signal a shift in the judicial system or reinforce existing divisions. This political impasse highlights the broader debate about judicial reform in Italy, demonstrating how deeply personal and politically charged the discourse has become in the lead-up to the referendum.