The article discusses the critique by the ruling party in Lithuania towards Saulius Skvernelis, highlighting their stance against what they perceive as hypocrisy in political morality. The posted message on their Facebook page emphasizes the inconsistency with which moral standards are applied, suggesting that while political figures often invoke high moral standards when discussing others, the same standards do not seem to apply to their own actions and allies. The phrase 'this is not morality, this is double standards' underlines the growing frustration with selective moral judgments in political discourse.

Specifically, Agnė Širinskienė, a prominent figure in the party, is cited as having repeatedly advocated for ethical conduct in politics. The article poses critical questions about the principles of accountability in the party, especially given its identification with Skvernelis as a singular leader. It challenges the narrative that legal issues faced by Skvernelis are solely individual problems, pushing for a broader reflection on the party’s collective responsibility, points to the need for a transparent and accountable political culture in Lithuania.

As the article notes, the assumption of innocence is a cornerstone of a legal state, yet it questions whether Skvernelis's issues also implicate the party as a whole, given the strong personal leadership model within it. This reflects a growing discourse in Lithuanian politics, highlighting the necessity of ethical consistency and collective responsibility, aspects that are crucial for the health of the democratic process and the rule of law in the country.