The article from Lrytas focuses on the implications of remarks by Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda concerning the controversies surrounding two politicians: G. Palucko and S. Skvernelis. It begins by highlighting the recent actions taken by the Special Investigation Service (STT), which involved conducting searches in the offices and homes of parliament members Saulius Skvernelis and Kazys Starkevičius. This event has reignited public debate about the integrity and accountability of politicians in Lithuania.

The author reflects on how Nausėda’s rhetoric has changed when addressing the two cases, suggesting a disparity in his reaction and the overall public discourse surrounding each politician's scandals. The piece raises questions about the motivations behind political responses and media portrayals, especially in context of a possible bias or varying standards applied to different political figures. It hints at the growing scrutiny of politicians and the legal framework surrounding corruption and misconduct in Lithuania.

By juxtaposing the past comments on G. Palucko with the current situation regarding S. Skvernelis, the article serves as a critique of political accountability and suggests that ongoing investigations may further impact the public's perception of trust in governmental institutions. It encourages readers to consider the implications of these scandalous events in shaping the future dynamics of Lithuanian politics.