Prime Minister Robert Fico and his ministers have faced criticism for their consistent avoidance of parliamentary discussions and accountability. They have neglected a year-long debate over a potential vote of no confidence and have refrained from addressing the parliament regarding critical issues such as the debt brake. This situation calls into question the government's commitment to democratic processes, particularly as it sidesteps opportunities for scrutiny in front of the National Council, which they are politically obliged to engage with.

President Peter Pellegrini publicly criticized the coalition for its reluctance to confront parliament, suggesting that the government should bravely stand before the legislature to answer for its actions. He highlighted the coalition's trend of postponing discussions on important topics and questioned whether they feared a potential negative outcome in the votes, indicating a level of apprehension about their parliamentary support. The ongoing pattern of avoidance fosters a climate of uncertainty concerning the government's accountability and transparency.

The article elaborates on seven specific instances showing the government's attempts to minimize opportunities for confrontation and criticism from the opposition. These examples underline a troubling trend where it appears the Fico administration seeks to evade parliamentary norms and expectations, raising concerns among critics about the state of democracy and governance in Slovakia. As the government continues to ignore critical discussions, the implications for democratic engagement in the country remain severe and consequential.