The article discusses growing frustration among Italian judges, particularly those affiliated with the opposition, towards the Democratic Party (PD) for its perceived inability to effectively challenge the current government's reforms. This dissatisfaction has been particularly pronounced following a failed attempt to postpone a referendum that could affect power dynamics within Italy's judiciary. The judges express their discontent in a private chat group, lamenting that the PD's weak stance allows the governing coalition led by Giorgia Meloni to dominate the political landscape.

Within the context of these recent developments, the judges highlight the urgency of the upcoming referendum scheduled for late March, which they feel threatens the traditional power structures within the judiciary. The reform agenda being pushed by the government, aligned with a pro-referendum stance, has heightened anxieties about the implications for judicial independence and the protection of judicial privileges. The judges' remarks reflect a deeper concern regarding the balance of power between the government and the judiciary, especially as the PD has struggled to mobilize effective resistance against these sweeping changes.

This internal critique within the judicial community signals broader implications for Italy's political environment, particularly as it relates to the effectiveness of the opposition. The PD's challenges are not only about policy opposition but also about rallying public support against a government that has been proactive in shaping the judicial landscape. The article encapsulates a critical moment for both the judiciary and the political opposition in Italy, raising questions about the future of judicial independence amid an increasingly strong executive authority.