In a recent discussion in Milan, Alfredo Montavano, Undersecretary to the Presidency of the Council, addressed the declining trust Italians have in their judiciary system. He emphasized that the perception of impartiality is crucial, advocating for reforms that would standardize the education and evaluation processes for judges and public prosecutors. Montavano, drawing from his past experiences as a magistrate, argued that this lack of unified training contributes to public skepticism.

During a debate with Enrico Grosso, the president of the ANM's committee against the reforms, Montavano acknowledged the need for change but questioned the methodology proposed. He pointed out that the existing system could be reformed through ordinary legislation rather than a constitutional overhaul. Grosso supported this view, suggesting a separation of competitions for judges and prosecutors as a more straightforward solution to improve the judiciary's functionality.

The conversation reflects a significant tension in Italian politics concerning judicial reforms and public trust. As Montavano and Grosso critique each other's approaches, they underscore a broader national concern about maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system, impacting political discourse and public confidence moving forward.